in reply to Re: number scaling ?
in thread number scaling ?
Which is not necessarily to say that AnonyMonk shouldn't be using one of the many CPAN graphing modules which will handle these details for him (I'm partial to GD::Graph, myself), but it is possible that he may have a legitimate need to do this.
1 0-6000 tends to go over better with end users than 3407.21-5296.37, so it's not just a matter of taking your minimum and maximum values as "0" and "100".
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: number scaling ?
by salazar (Scribe) on Mar 13, 2009 at 00:49 UTC |