Re: Re: Licensing for Safety

It just occurred to me that the GPL probably isn't an option in my particular scenario because of its lack of compatibility (to my understanding, but I may be wrong) with Python's license. Darn...

Update: Actually, after having read this, Python code seems to be GPL-able in 2.1...but the web host uses v1.5.2...doh, I lose again. :)

Comment on Re: Re: Licensing for Safety

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Licensing for Safety by orkysoft (Friar) on Apr 25, 2001 at 02:27 UTC
Why would the license of your code be restricted by the license of the interpreter/compiler? Can't you GPL your code, even though the interpreter isn't GPL?	[reply]