in reply to Re^3: The early history of Perlmonks
in thread The early history of Perlmonks

The time period is wrong for that to be the triggering event.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: The early history of Perlmonks
by Argel (Prior) on Mar 31, 2009 at 23:19 UTC
    Sorry, I meant that the most notable event occuring while you were away was likely the plagiarism incident.

    Elda Taluta; Sarks Sark; Ark Arks
[reply]
      What I meant is that a node from 2006-10 would not have triggered code changes in 2002-06.

      Also note that I did return then get uninvolved again in the 2003 time period.

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion