in reply to Re: DBD message diagnostic?
in thread DBD message diagnostic?
OK. That explains why scripts that worked on my XP system no longer work on my Vista system. The former had DBD::Pg and the latter DBD::PgPP
The problem is implementation differences between DBD::Pg and DBD::PgPP. The former defaults to making a tcp connection unless you set the host parameter to path, in which case it will try for a unix-domain socket. On Win, it could try for a named-pipe connection. I guess it would just take for someone to write the patch.
(I wonder why the PgPP author deviated and introduced the path parameter. It makes the host default useless.)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: DBD message diagnostic?
by bellaire (Hermit) on Apr 15, 2009 at 11:52 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 15, 2009 at 13:54 UTC | |
|
Re^3: DBD message diagnostic?
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 15, 2009 at 14:01 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 15, 2009 at 14:50 UTC |