Re: He didnt explicitly pass @

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: He didnt explicitly pass @_ by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Apr 21, 2009 at 16:00 UTC
... not forgetting perlvar A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))	[reply]
Re^3: He didnt explicitly pass @_ by parv (Parson) on Apr 21, 2009 at 16:26 UTC
Truthfully, perlvar did not come to my mind at the time to check for relevance. So, did I miss something in OP as the perlvar entry, without adding anything extra, points to perlsub ?	[reply]
Re^4: He didnt explicitly pass @_ by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Apr 21, 2009 at 17:08 UTC
perlvar provides a one-line explanation as to the use/meaning of `@_` - perlsub, if the OP is/was sufficiently interested, expands on that [the perlvar entry], so in conclusion, IMO, it does add something: simplistic brevity ;D A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: He didnt explicitly pass @_ by tye (Sage) on Apr 22, 2009 at 02:52 UTC