in reply to Re: Git vs Hg or GitHub vs Bitbucket for Perl projects
in thread Git vs Hg or GitHub vs Bitbucket for Perl projects

++. I've had--am having; not quite to cruising speed yet--the same experience. Not easy to jump into. Really not. "WTF are they talking about, Git sucks," not. But the more I get it, the more I really like it. Powerful and quick once you get over some of the conceptual differences from SVN/CVS. It's also been around long enough at this point that most "How do I..." Google queries turn up an answer from someone who had the same hurdle and got over it. I don't know Hg but I do know what little of Perforce I was once forced to use made me :(

  • Comment on Re^2: Git vs Hg or GitHub vs Bitbucket for Perl projects

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Git vs Hg or GitHub vs Bitbucket for Perl projects
by Burak (Chaplain) on Apr 26, 2009 at 21:53 UTC
    I don't know Hg but I do know what little of Perforce I was once forced to use made me :(
    Yeah, I must admit that Perforce is not that friendly. I did a lot of work related to it like writing some automatic branching stuff around p4 commands for example. But I think it'll be hard to do anything complicated with the help of `p4 help` or Googling around. Luckily we had the perforce book in the office. Does not have a 100% coverage but good enough :)