in reply to Re^4: Modern Perl Programming Highs and Lows
in thread Modern Perl Programming Highs and Lows

Did you bother to click on the link? It looks like 7 of 17 dependencies are non-core, but maybe you and cpandeps have different definitions of "core."
  • Comment on Re^5: Modern Perl Programming Highs and Lows

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Modern Perl Programming Highs and Lows
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Apr 30, 2009 at 06:58 UTC

      Both 5.8.9 and 5.10.0 are very recent releases. There are *plenty* of people still using 5.8.8, because 5.8.8 was, for a very long time, the most recent version of perl.

      When you say similar things about people still using perl 5.6 then you do at least have a valid point. But saying that about 5.8.8 seems just crazy.

        There are *plenty* of people still using 5.8.8, because 5.8.8 was, for a very long time, the most recent version of perl.

        You're right; I had forgotten about Mac OS X.

        5.10.0 are very recent releases.

        Not so long ago, software whose latest release was a year and a half ago wasn't considered "very recent", but "old, outdated" and possibly "dead".

        Now, I don't agree with the latter part, but I certainly don't consider a release that is a year and a half old as "very recent".

      So everyone using the current release of Mac OS X should install their own Perl to use Moose?
      % perl -v This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
        Really?. That looks like 4 modules to me with only 2 as non-core.
Re^6: Modern Perl Programming Highs and Lows
by Sartak (Hermit) on Apr 30, 2009 at 02:49 UTC

    You're both right, sort of.

    The latest Test::Exception depends on a minimum of (for example) Test::More 0.70, which is only in core if you are running perl 5.10.