in reply to Re^2: The behavior is [sic] undefined
in thread The behavior is [sic] undefined

So, that leaves "the behaviour is unspecified" to describe the situation that you otherwise describe as "a shortcut for saying that the specification for the behavior is undefined.". Seems good to me.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: The behavior is [sic] undefined
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on May 13, 2009 at 20:23 UTC
    That sounds right. And hangon points out that the common meaning for "behavior" is "expected behavior". So I'm really saying that the expectation is undefined.

    That does seem to be how languages evolve. But when the referent is the part that got left out or left behind, it can be very annoying to more cultured ears. Like a home-improvement show says "to poly the bookcase". Er, the verb you wanted is varnish. But was "varnish" itself a noun that got turned into a verb? Apparently the word can be traced all the way back to the name of the Greek city of Κυρηναϊκή. Go figure.