C:\test>junk4 -NTHREADS=1000
STOP: Tue May 19 16:26:26 2009
1000000 1242746771.5932.out
And this is 20 concurrent copies each running 100 concurrent threads each:
C:\test>for /l %i in ( 1,1,20 ) do @start /b junk4 -NTHREADS=100
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:35 2009
100000 1242745650.6976.out
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:35 2009
100000 1242745651.0876.out
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:36 2009
100000 1242745651.15.out
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:37 2009
100000 1242745651.7896.out
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:48 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:48 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:49 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:50 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:51 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:51 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:51 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:51 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:52 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:52 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:52 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:52 2009
100000 1242745654.972.out
100000 1242745654.8784.out
100000 1242745656.0952.out
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:52 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:52 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:52 2009
STOP: Tue May 19 16:07:52 2009
100000 1242745656.142.out
100000 1242745656.1576.out
100000 1242745657.1092.out
100000 1242745657.1716.out
100000 1242745657.9048.out
100000 1242745657.5304.out
100000 1242745657.3432.out
100000 1242745657.2652.out
100000 1242745656.5476.out
100000 1242745655.596.out
100000 1242745655.8768.out
100000 1242745654.7536.out
100000 1242745654.3012.out
Nary a whiff of a problem. Still unconvinced it works fine here?
Is that other OS (I assume that's what you meant by SO?), based on the same kernel? Or compiled against the same CRT? Or both?
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
|