Re^2: Named Subroutine Parameters: Compile-time errors vs. Run-time warnings

The only difference in error handling that I can think of might result from unquoted keys ...

I don't understand this point. Can you give an example?

Comment on Re^2: Named Subroutine Parameters: Compile-time errors vs. Run-time warnings

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Named Subroutine Parameters: Compile-time errors vs. Run-time warnings by LanX (Saint) on May 26, 2009 at 21:12 UTC
Sorry please forget it. It was just a guess that the fat comma `=>` might act differently in curlies than in a parameter list, resulting in another (or missing) quoting behavior of barewords at the LHS. But this wouldn't make sense...	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Named Subroutine Parameters: Compile-time errors vs. Run-time warnings by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on May 27, 2009 at 03:09 UTC
You're right: fat comma acts the same regardless of curly or non-curly context.	[reply]