Re^2: simple string comparison for efficiency

Searching this site for recommendations of BioPerl...

If you are looking for an efficient solution, stay away from BioPerl

citromatik

Comment on Re^2: simple string comparison for efficiency

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: simple string comparison for efficiency by etj (Priest) on Nov 17, 2024 at 16:56 UTC
To quote from (the Wayback version of) that page: Why BioPerl is Fast BLAST tiling in C++: development 1 mo. + analysis 5min; BLAST tiling in BioPerl: development 2 d + analysis 30min. (the reason cited for BioPerl running slowly is their use of inheritance)	[reply]