And using weird names is good for named subroutines that get autogenerated by code

The question is wether it is good to name subroutines autogenerated by code in the symbol table. With a dispatch table hash you can name your subroutines by chunks of jpeg files, nice. But symbol tables are namespaces and their entries good for importing/exporting/localizing. I'd rather expect programmers to adhere to perl principles here.

Q: Why do you do that?
A: Because I can!