in reply to Re^5: Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good
in thread Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good
I know you know that best nodes is also sliced on a month and a year.
There's been some discussion in the CB lately about doing things like letting monks over a certain level keep their links unaltered otherwise they might garner a ref="nofollow". I think this would also be a good idea to apply to nodes based on rep (and corresponding meta tags in single-node views). Even if it weren't being used at all, meaningful data is worth collecting. It's true anonymous monk posts don't often land on the best of page. I think they would more often if there were less reticence to "waste" votes on them.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^7: Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good (links)
by tye (Sage) on Jun 04, 2009 at 19:17 UTC | |
|
Re^7: Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 04, 2009 at 19:14 UTC |