in reply to Re: Sorting "SuperSearch" results by votes?
in thread Sorting "SuperSearch" results by votes?
But I'm pretty confident that sorting by reputation can be "more useful" than sorting by time.
Anyway usefulness is in the eye of the beholder and can't be measured objectively ...
And if it's not possible to search by rep, why do we bother to collect them, only to keep people busy and interested in the XP-game???
For completeness, after playing around with google's sitesearch I was able to find some useful posts... ranking pages by links pointing to them is not too bad... 8 )
Cheers Rolf
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Sorting "SuperSearch" results by votes?
by almut (Canon) on Jun 05, 2009 at 00:21 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jun 05, 2009 at 08:26 UTC | |
by tye (Sage) on Jun 05, 2009 at 13:53 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jun 05, 2009 at 19:10 UTC |