in reply to Re^5: Negative zero from a multiplication by a zero?
in thread Negative zero from a multiplication by a zero?

that meant that source code on machine X may not generate the same results as on machine Y. Machine X will probably do what Machine X does repeatably!

"platform-specific" or "not portable" are common terms to describe this.

I think the whole idea of this thread was that when you are dealing with either very big or very small numbers, there are a lot of ways to "get into trouble"

I don't know to what large numbers, small numbers and trouble you are referring. I did not get any such idea from this thread. Quite the opposite, the OP's question was about a feature that *prevents* you from getting into trouble in a particular situation.

  • Comment on Re^6: Negative zero from a multiplication by a zero?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Negative zero from a multiplication by a zero?
by Marshall (Canon) on Jun 09, 2009 at 22:10 UTC
    I think we've gone past what the op wanted to know.
    The "big" number thing came about with %24.16e format.
    I would ask the Op to tell us what didn't get answered from the original post.
      "00000000000000000000000000000000" is no bigger a number than "0". the .16 was to make sure the number wasn't really -0.00....001 masquerading as -0.