Re^2: Creating Index with Plucene

I installed it and ran the following piece of code

use strict;

use Plucene::Simple;

###### INPUT #######################
my $index_path = "./idexdir";
####################################

# create an index
my $plucy = Plucene::Simple->open($index_path);
$plucy->index_document(doc1 => 'Go to restaurant');
$plucy->index_document(doc2 => 'Return money');

exit(0);
[download]

and got a set of files like _1.f1 .... which I do not understand.
I expected to get an index file which I could use for my purposes.
What I did wrong? or this index can only be used by Plucene search.

Comment on Re^2: Creating Index with Plucene Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Creating Index with Plucene by Anonymous Monk on Jun 16, 2009 at 23:25 UTC
Plucene::Index::Reader	[reply]
Re^4: Creating Index with Plucene by vit (Friar) on Jun 17, 2009 at 02:42 UTC
What am I doing wrong here: `use strict; use Plucene::Simple; use Plucene::Index::Reader; ###### INPUT ####################### my $index_path = "./idexdir"; #################################### # create an index my $plucy = Plucene::Simple->open($index_path); $plucy->index_document(doc1 => 'Go to restaurant'); $plucy->index_document(doc2 => 'Return money'); my $reader = Plucene::Index::Reader->new($index_path); my Plucene::Index::SegmentsReader $seg_read = $reader->open; print "$seg_read\n"; exit(0);` [download] It returns `Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at c:/Active +Perl/site/lib/Plucene/Index/SegmentInfos.pm line 57. read_file '/segments' - sysopen: No such file or directory at c:/Activ +ePerl/site/lib/Plucene/Index/SegmentInfos.pm line 57` [download] In SegmentInfos.pm there is a statement `my ($count, @unpack) = unpack "NN/(w/aN)", read_file("$directory/segme +nts");` [download] which I do not understand. What is "segments" here?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Creating Index with Plucene by Anonymous Monk on Jul 03, 2009 at 06:43 UTC
you could used $writer->set_mergefactor(anyvalue); while creating index	[reply]