Re: Assessing a statistical argument on the fraudulance of the Iranian elections

Your finding of 3.7% is consistent with the article's statement of "fewer than four in a hundred".

Comment on Re: Assessing a statistical argument on the fraudulance of the Iranian elections

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Assessing a statistical argument on the fraudulance of the Iranian elections by whakka (Hermit) on Jun 24, 2009 at 02:39 UTC
I understand - originally I had misread the statement and didn't test the "both" condition. I wanted to replicate it nevertheless.	[reply]