in reply to Obfuscators will run for cover now...

Nifty. This'll be a great help in understanding some of the wilder JAPHs here. One obvious limitation is that obfuscations that reference themselves (via rewinding DATA) get broken in the tidying process.

  • Comment on Re: Obfuscators will run for cover now...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
B::Deparse for me
by grinder (Bishop) on May 03, 2001 at 14:31 UTC

    I prefer B::Deparse. Obfuscations get extra points if they break that! Although from what I hear on p5p a lot of work is going into making it more robust at the moment. I like the way B::Deparse normalises things, something that PerlTidy doesn't seem to do.

    % perl -MO=Deparse -e '$foo="bar"."rat"'
-e syntax OK
$foo = 'barrat';

    [download]

    --
    g r i n d e r
[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Meditations