in reply to spell checker
Um, why not simply compose messages offline using a text editor sporting such a beast? Indeed, there are many that let you customize the spelling processor so that it would accept "normal" English (whatever that is), common TLA's, and code.
Alternatively, you could write such a thing, host on your servers, and perhaps even upload the source as a CUFP.
--f
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re (tilly) 2: spell checker
by tilly (Archbishop) on May 03, 2001 at 07:37 UTC |