in reply to spell checker

Um, why not simply compose messages offline using a text editor sporting such a beast? Indeed, there are many that let you customize the spelling processor so that it would accept "normal" English (whatever that is), common TLA's, and code.

Alternatively, you could write such a thing, host on your servers, and perhaps even upload the source as a CUFP.

--f

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re (tilly) 2: spell checker
by tilly (Archbishop) on May 03, 2001 at 07:37 UTC
    There are some who advocate going a step further, by putting their editor online and getting rid of the browser...

    /duck