in reply to recursive dependencies in 5.8.8 vs 5.10 and CPAN

In Perl 5.8.8 a "perl -MP -e1" does not complain, however Perl 5.10 refuses (and rightly so in my opinion) to compile it.
Wait. 5.8.8 DWIM, and 5.10 regresses and doesn't, and you think 5.10 is right? I'd think it's wrong for 5.10 to break code that runs fine in 5.8.8. Perl already knows how to lose itself into infinite recursion:
$ cat A.pm use B; 1; $ cat B.pm use A; 1; $ perl -MA -we1 $
See, no infinite recursion here, so it's not that hard.

My question now is: Is there any systematic overview on which CPAN-modules may have a problem when running under 5.10?
No. See, if it were known, it would have been fixed by the time 5.10 came out.

Note you can prevent this from happening again. 5.10.1 will be here soon. TODAY is a good time to compile a snapshot of perl and test your code, and the CPAN modules you depend on, so you won't be caught off-guard by the time 5.10.1 hits the street.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: recursive dependencies in 5.8.8 vs 5.10 and CPAN
by afoken (Chancellor) on Jul 04, 2009 at 11:00 UTC

    The OP talked about INHERITANCE. Your example leaves that out.

    Alexander

    --
    Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)
      What's inheritance got to do with "I'm walking a graph. I keep track of where I have been. I don't visit nodes I've already visited. Look ma! I'm new and shiny 5.10. Now I can no longer keep track of where I've been"?