in reply to Threads weirdness
Passing around objects among threads is fraught with potential for errors. I think the basic principle is that you'll get a copy unless you declare something as explicitly :shared. See threads and threads::shared. Personally, I'd try to decouple the scheduler from the worker(s) and have a queue in each direction to pass commands forth and receive the status (+data) back from the worker(s).
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Threads weirdness
by reasonablekeith (Deacon) on Jul 06, 2009 at 14:50 UTC |