I know it's not as elegant as the code above, but I think it's a bit better than my first one.
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use warnings;
local $/ = undef;
my $string = <>;
my @array = split(//, $string);
my %hash;
foreach (@array) {
if ($_ =~ /\w/) {
$hash{$_}++;
}
}
my @keys = sort keys %hash;
my $total;
foreach (values %hash) {
$total += $_;
}
foreach (@keys) {
printf "%s\t%d\t%.3f\n", $_, $hash{$_}, $hash{$_}/$total;
}
print "$total characters\n";
| [reply] [d/l] |
This is lovely code. It has a nice balance between terseness and clarity.
Despite your baptism of fire, I hope you stay around. You'll learn a lot of stuff, not all necessarily about Perl.
• another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl
| [reply] |
This code is a huge improvement, except for the variable names!
You started with names like $total_chars and %ascii_counts, and ended up with $total and %hash. %hash and @array are about the worst variable names you can use.
You've come a long way very quickly, and kudos for taking the criticism well.
| [reply] |
I was hoping you'd come by. Welcome to the Monastery.
This is 100x better. Well-done. Variable names can be improved, but I can actually scan this code and understand the basic intent. The biggest improvement now would be to skip intermediate variables that only exist once. So, something like:
use strict;
use warnings FATAL => 'all';
use List::Utils qw( sum );
my $input = do {
local $/;
<>;
};
my %letters;
$letters{$_}++ for grep /\w/, split //, $input;
my $total = sum values %letters;
for ( sort keys %letters ) {
printf "%s\t%d\t%.3f\n", $_, $letters{$_}, $letters{$_}/$total;
}
print "$total characters\n";
The big differences there are:
- Removing intermediate variables
- Scoping the localization of $/
- Using a module to do the summation
- Chaining functions in the grep split.
This would be considered more "perlish". Remember - readablity also includes conciseness. This is why well-written Java is less readable than well-written Perl.
My criteria for good software:
- Does it work?
- Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?
| [reply] [d/l] |
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
| [reply] |