in reply to VI VI VI - the number of the beast
(I know you found your error, but the fact that you say it's on line 1 implies that neither mechanism is set, and I betcha that perl would have seen that immediately).
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: VI VI VI - the number of the beast
by DrZaius (Monk) on May 05, 2001 at 20:02 UTC | |
by Masem (Monsignor) on May 05, 2001 at 23:14 UTC | |
by chipmunk (Parson) on May 06, 2001 at 08:57 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: VI VI VI - the number of the beast
by jepri (Parson) on May 05, 2001 at 19:49 UTC | |
by chipmunk (Parson) on May 05, 2001 at 20:17 UTC | |
by jepri (Parson) on May 05, 2001 at 20:21 UTC |