Re^5: Status of Recent User Information Leak

in reply to Re^4: Status of Recent User Information Leak
in thread Status of Recent User Information Leak

Obviously you did not (choose to)? read/understand my clarification. Not misinformation; simply not worded as precisely as I'd have liked. But then, that does not fit the conspiracy theory, does it?

HTH,

planetscape

Comment on Re^5: Status of Recent User Information Leak

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Status of Recent User Information Leak by Zen (Deacon) on Aug 04, 2009 at 18:02 UTC
It is misinformation. It clearly says admins were vilified for notifying all users. Untrue. Factually incorrect. All users were not notified.	[reply]
Re^7: Status of Recent User Information Leak by planetscape (Chancellor) on Aug 04, 2009 at 18:12 UTC
Admins were vilified for posting the notice to The Monastery Gates, in an attempt to notify all users visitng the site, as I said in my addendum. You well know the impossibility of notifying some 40K users, who may well have inputted bogus e-mails, e-mails that were current when inputted but have since fallen out of use, etc. Not to mention spam filters and so on. I can only conclude your definition of "factual" differs greatly from my own. HTH, planetscape	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Perl Monks Discussion