in reply to Re^2: A non-voteable, user-updateable node? (nodetypes)
in thread A non-voteable, user-updateable node?

it may be that the public part of a scratchpad is actually housed in the document table and so conversion isn't even a problem).

That is precisely the situation; so converting a note to a scratchpad would be trivial.

However, it does seem like making last hour of cb a document, rather than a scratchpad, makes some sense. I don't see any features of scratchpad which would bring any benefit in this case.
And converting a note to a document is dead trivial: simply change its type from 11 to 3. (Yeah, we'd orphan a row in the note table, but that's probably not worth worrying about one time.)

Between the mind which plans and the hands which build, there must be a mediator... and this mediator must be the heart.
  • Comment on Re^3: A non-voteable, user-updateable node? (nodetypes)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: A non-voteable, user-updateable node? (nodetypes)
by tye (Sage) on Aug 06, 2009 at 02:28 UTC

    Who do you want to own it? (Either you or a group, though an AccessRule probably works also.)

    - tye        

[reply]
      That's a good question. I don't think it's worth making a new accessrule for, so one of the groups I'm in would be the way to go. But which one. While neither SDC nor pmdev seems like a perfect fit, I'd say that pmdev is a poorer fit than SDC, I'd go with the latter. But really, you're the boss, so I defer to your judgement.
[reply]

        SDC seems a much better choice. Done. I bet your update script still works.

        I don't like that the HTML is currently not filtered, however. So I might write a patch to change that (after checking if that'd break anything).

        I guess it is filtered. Cool.

        - tye        

[reply]

In Section Inner Scriptorium