in reply to Repost: User Editor Page and clear text passwords (Feb 15, 2004)

From the CB:

toolic's sure there must be a point to this node: Repost: User Editor Page and clear text passwords (Feb 15, 2004)

ssandv: to use up a (negative) vote! That's what I used it for.

The purpose was to show to others who have not been swayed by the apologists (such as ssandv) that this incident was known, was requested to fixed, and was not.

Downvote all you want.

  • Comment on Re: Repost: User Editor Page and clear text passwords (Feb 15, 2004)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Repost: User Editor Page and clear text passwords (Feb 15, 2004)
by ssandv (Hermit) on Aug 12, 2009 at 20:39 UTC
    And the purpose of the downvote was because these things were never in dispute. It was never hard to find out that this was a security improvement which had been requested, but not yet implemented. It struck me as senseless to have yet another thread, when the current discussion is still active in more than one thread already. Surely it would have made more sense to link it there?
Re^2: Repost: User Editor Page and clear text passwords (Feb 15, 2004)
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 13, 2009 at 03:08 UTC