Execute by order

way has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Execute by order by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 13, 2009 at 04:03 UTC
Create a list, execute each script in the list. Or create a list of commands where each executes a script. The exact implementation doesn't matter unless you have some unspecified special requirements. Provide more details!	[reply]
Re: Execute by order by mzedeler (Pilgrim) on Aug 13, 2009 at 09:53 UTC
Post the most important code here - then you'll probably get more advice.	[reply]
Re: Execute by order by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Aug 13, 2009 at 11:11 UTC
Aside from the earlier pertinent contributions made, on this thread, by the other monks, I would point out that, if i understand you correctly, if you persist with ...using files and "while" as a queqe at its simplest, then you won't be able to do ...someone of those at same time, - especially on Windoze. A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))	[reply]
Re^2: Execute by order by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 13, 2009 at 11:28 UTC
if you persist with ...using files and "while" as a queqe at its simplest, then you won't be able to do ...someone of those at same time, - especially on Windoze. Why? In particular, why - especially on Windoze? Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. RIP PCW It is as I've been saying!(Audio until 20090817)	[reply]
Re^3: Execute by order by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Aug 13, 2009 at 13:13 UTC
...depends on the implementation I suppose - I took it to mean using `while` to iterate thro' a list of simple commands i.e. no parallelism. On *NIX, I submit it is easy to modify the command strings to run a command in parallel ... which, IIRC, isn't possible on Windoze. A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Execute by order by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 13, 2009 at 13:43 UTC
Re^5: Execute by order by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Aug 13, 2009 at 13:54 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^4: Execute by order by way (Sexton) on Aug 13, 2009 at 14:58 UTC
Re^5: Execute by order by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Aug 13, 2009 at 15:19 UTC
Re: Execute by order by Anonymous Monk on Aug 13, 2009 at 04:04 UTC
No.	[reply]
Re^2: Execute by order by youlose (Scribe) on Aug 13, 2009 at 04:51 UTC
it's lie! author need more data	[reply]