in reply to Re: Re: reversing a sort...
in thread reversing a sort...
Testing this is going to be tricky, of course, because sorting effiency depends on the order you see elements in.
Also this is a very, very special case. With more complex sorts there is choice about how to write it either way, and reverse has to be a waste of time.
UPDATE
Bloody language maintainers. Going and rendering my
hard-won optimization knowledge obsolete by making
everything fast. Bah.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re (tilly) 3: reversing a sort...
by chipmunk (Parson) on May 09, 2001 at 05:22 UTC |