Re^6: log level in modules

I'm confused. Are you trying to help or get off on some power trip?

I ask questions here because I know someone has the answer. But it never fails: ask a simple question and you get asked for your life story. Ask a question with context then people worry about everything but the question.

If you know why get_logger isn't getting the modified logger, great! Tell me.

If you know how to fix my problem, great! Tell me.

If you're trying to give constructive feedback on my post so I can better ask any future questions, your failing.

Comment on Re^6: log level in modules

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: log level in modules by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 22, 2009 at 03:32 UTC
If you know how to fix my problem, great! Tell me. I would if I knew. I don't, so I asked you question to help fix it. Maybe you should consider answering them instead of this ...whatever it is? I don't know why you expect changes to some variable to have some some effect on the return value of `get_logger`. You haven't shown anything tying the two together. You provided so little information that all I can do is rule out causes until you provide more information. Waiting for answers to: ~~When you say "forks", are you actually referring to the creation of new threads?~~ (Eventually answered) Why do you think it has anything to do with forking? Why do you think it has anything to do with signals? Why do you think changes to one variable should have some effect in the return value of `get_logger` Where can I find a minimal runnable demonstration of the problem?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^8: log level in modules by Anonymous Monk on Aug 24, 2009 at 13:55 UTC
Why do you think it has anything to do with forking? Don't recall saying it did. Forking was mentioned as part of context and when answering questions Why do you think it has anything to do with signals? Don't recall saying it did. Simply mentioned that I'm using a signal to trigger the change in level. Again, context. Why do you think changes to one variable should have some effect in the return value of `get_logger` My understanding is that `get_logger` returnes a reference to the logger. Making changes using that reference would then make changes to the logger. Why wouldn't subsequent calls to `get_logger` return the modified logger?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^9: log level in modules by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 24, 2009 at 14:02 UTC
Don't recall saying it did. More importantly, you didn't say it didn't. You thought it was related enough to mention, so please go rule it out. Still waiting for code.	[reply]