in reply to Stupid stumpers and good questions

There are two types of questions, each with two sub-categories:

I've stated it before at greater length, but I'm here to learn, not teach; to offer, not impose; to be stimulated, not revered. If anything, I am more frustrated by stock answers--and stock non-answers--than stock questions.

The really interesting thing about the questions asked by non-Perlers and non-programmers, is that they often ask the stock questions in really interesting ways. With these, the best bit is not the answer to the question, but rather the best phrasing of the stock answer to best serve the questioner. In that respect, this place has probably done as much to improve my analytical & language skills as it has my programming skills.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
RIP PCW It is as I've been saying!(Audio until 20090817)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Stupid stumpers and good questions
by raisputin (Scribe) on Sep 21, 2009 at 23:22 UTC
    wow, I just realized I subconsciously break them down that way as well...cool