in reply to Re: Stupid stumpers and good questions
in thread Stupid stumpers and good questions

I've used that phrase many times at work myself. But that fails to give it proper context. For over 12 years now, I've told new hires, students, and others, something along the lines of: "You may have heard that there is no such thing as a stupid question. I don't subscribe to that view. There are stupid questions. Those are the questions that are asked without effort or understanding." This has generally been part of my "don't be afraid to ask questions" speech for new team members. I want to encourage them to ask questions, but mostly as a way to become unstuck in their efforts. If I'm answering all the questions for my subteam, I'll never get any other work done. I want them to find that fine line between pestering me and getting work done (it doesn't do me any good for them to spend 2 hours deciphering something I can answer in 2 minutes, so long as they aren't asking me something every 10 minutes).

  • Comment on Re^2: Stupid stumpers and good questions

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Stupid stumpers and good questions
by ack (Deacon) on Sep 11, 2009 at 18:40 UTC

    Thanks Tanktalus, I love the context that you subscribe to. Very nicely and succinctly put. I will try adjust my approach to provide that distinction "...to encourage them to ask questions, but mostly as a way to become unstuck in their efforts...to find that fine line between pestering and getting work done...." I love that. Thanks, again.

    ack Albuquerque, NM