in reply to Re^4: They've fscked with CPAN.pm again
in thread They've fscked with CPAN.pm again

Had that been your intent, it would have been accepted gratefully & gracefully.

  • Comment on Re^5: They've fscked with CPAN.pm again

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: They've fscked with CPAN.pm again
by DrHyde (Prior) on Sep 16, 2009 at 09:53 UTC
    My intention was to point out two possible sources of the problem (Activestate and Windows), which appeared to be what differentiated your system from all the different ones I've used without observing your problem. I think that you therefore owe me a "thankyou", given that you have said that if that was my intent you would be grateful. To withhold it would be most ungraceful.

      The sad part is, you really seem to think that is useful information in answering my question.

      The "blame game" rarely helps anyone.