in reply to Converting a string to a real numeric value - what's faster?

Now, yesterday, I ran into an issue that involved quite low-level transformations and as it turned out (thanks tofjw!), my string value was simply ignored and a *true* numeric value worked.
Really? If that's true, then there's a bug in Perl. Perhaps you can show a code fragment that shows this behaviour?
Now: what is the best way to transform a string to a true numeric value, in terms of speed/internal efficiency?
You tell us. Run a benchmark and tell us. Note also that they aren't equivalent if $string contains, say "1.23". Of course, I would expect that the fastest solution is to do nothing, and to let perl decide if and when a conversion is needed. And way faster still would be the get rid of Perl, ditch the CGI interface, and write embedded C.
  • Comment on Re: Converting a string to a real numeric value - what's faster?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Converting a string to a real numeric value - what's faster?
by isync (Hermit) on Sep 17, 2009 at 09:45 UTC

    "Really? If that's true, then there's a bug in Perl."

    No need to worry: it was a known bug in an XS module I use here, and the developer of the module already fixed it - but it steered my attention towards this string/number thing.

    "You tell us."

    Call me a lazy bum, but being the noob that I am at proper benchmarking, I thought a quick post and a question to people who know the Perl internals would be faster.
      to people who know the Perl internals

      perlmonks ne perl5-porters ;)