in reply to Converting a string to a real numeric value - what's faster?
Now, yesterday, I ran into an issue that involved quite low-level transformations and as it turned out (thanks tofjw!), my string value was simply ignored and a *true* numeric value worked.Really? If that's true, then there's a bug in Perl. Perhaps you can show a code fragment that shows this behaviour?
Now: what is the best way to transform a string to a true numeric value, in terms of speed/internal efficiency?You tell us. Run a benchmark and tell us. Note also that they aren't equivalent if $string contains, say "1.23". Of course, I would expect that the fastest solution is to do nothing, and to let perl decide if and when a conversion is needed. And way faster still would be the get rid of Perl, ditch the CGI interface, and write embedded C.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Converting a string to a real numeric value - what's faster?
by isync (Hermit) on Sep 17, 2009 at 09:45 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 17, 2009 at 10:04 UTC |