Re: Text-xSV-0.2 > Text::xSV

I would say so, but then again I would, since I use no other ... by choice. It also has the advantage of having the flexibility to handle a file containing any char delimited fields whilst keeping the same interface.

A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))

Comment on Re: Text-xSV-0.2 > Text::xSV

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Text-xSV-0.2 > Text::xSV by Limbic~Region (Chancellor) on Sep 23, 2009 at 12:27 UTC
Bloodnok, It also has the advantage of having the flexibility to handle a file containing any char delimited fields whilst keeping the same interface. Advantage over what? Win was asking about 2 different versions of the same module. Are you saying that one version of Text::xSV doesn't support any char delimiter or that it changed interfaces? Perhaps you were implying it were superior to a different module all together - if so, I would be interested in knowing which one(s). There is a lot of FUD out there about Text::CSV for instance. Cheers - L~R	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Text-xSV-0.2 > Text::xSV
by Limbic~Region (Chancellor) on Sep 23, 2009 at 12:27 UTC

Bloodnok

It also has the advantage of having the flexibility to handle a file containing any char delimited fields whilst keeping the same interface.

Advantage over what? Win was asking about 2 different versions of the same module. Are you saying that one version of Text::xSV doesn't support any char delimiter or that it changed interfaces? Perhaps you were implying it were superior to a different module all together - if so, I would be interested in knowing which one(s). There is a lot of FUD out there about Text::CSV for instance.

Cheers - L~R

[reply]