in reply to Re^2: Prototype for constant items???
in thread Prototype for constant items???
I want the possibility of a more rigid compile-time checking
And therein lies your problem.
Prototypes are primarily hints for the parser what to expect next, and allow you to write functions that syntactically resemble built-in functions.
When you abuse them for anything else you're bound to run into limitations rather soon.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Prototype for constant items???
by LanX (Saint) on Sep 25, 2009 at 13:52 UTC | |
by moritz (Cardinal) on Sep 25, 2009 at 14:04 UTC |