Re: Problems with Safe compartment reval parameters

Aside from the missing use Safe;, share says "Each NAME must be the name of a non-lexical variable" (emphasis mine). You successfully shared %main::params, which isn't too useful since you never put a value in it.

Comment on Re: Problems with Safe compartment reval parameters Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Problems with Safe compartment reval parameters by winneymj (Initiate) on Sep 28, 2009 at 02:30 UTC
Just updated the code example to make it more clear the initialization of the hash. Thanks	[reply]
Re^3: Problems with Safe compartment reval parameters by GrandFather (Saint) on Sep 28, 2009 at 02:44 UTC
The important bit is that `my %params ...` declares a lexical variable. share only deals with package variables: `%params ...` which may make it less useful when strictures (use strict; use warnings;) are used (using strictures is highly recommended btw). True laziness is hard work	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Problems with Safe compartment reval parameters by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 28, 2009 at 02:53 UTC
Yes, you are initialising a hash, but not the one the one you're sharing. `share` shares package variables — `%main::params` in this case — but you're initialising a lexical (`my`) variable. Change `my %params` to `local our %params`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]