Re^4: Inlining a "lexically-scoped scalar which has no other references"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Inlining a "lexically-scoped scalar which has no other references" by LanX (Saint) on Sep 28, 2009 at 02:21 UTC
Well the question "what for" was the next after identfying "what is it"... (I hoped to find a new black magic gadget to play with ;-) I think the intended logic was "if optimization produces a constant return value, then the value will be inlined"! Is this a now bug or is it just deprecated and the docs are out of phase? Consequently: Do I have to start perlbug or do I have to send a mail to pod-people...? Cheers Rolf	[reply]
Re^6: Inlining a "lexically-scoped scalar which has no other references" by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 28, 2009 at 02:56 UTC
I'd use perlbug, especially since it isn't clear if this is a regression or a doc error (since we can't fathom its use).	[reply]