in reply to Re^2: Pair-Wise Clustering
in thread Pair-Wise Clustering
"the data for sequence 4 in this example is not in the table above"
Don't you think it might be imperative that the table has representations of the sequences you've provided instead of showing us the sequences but showing a different table of perhaps different similarity scores. I tried mapping the sequences to the matrix to get the scores associated with each nucleotide but without the scoring weight I can't of course know how two nucleotides evaluation is assigned values representing the strength of the pairwise similarity checks.
You said there're two clusters, please shed light into how these clusters are deduced. I am asking all these questions so I can help clarifying the problem because probably someone can come with a more optimal approach than the one you're following or can guide you to what the right thing to do is.
Finally, "I am doing my best to explain my problem".
And no doubt that we'd do our best to understand and help solve the problem each in our own capacities. Check these ( First link, recursive formula.), and maybe this one More efficient way to lookup with 2 AoA's. for some initial warm-up.
Welcome to Perl Monks and have a happy Perl journey.
Update: subroutines and references are easy concepts to pick, if you give yourself 10 days to sit for them., you would know another definition for the sentence "Powerful Fun".
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Pair-Wise Clustering
by SuicideJunkie (Vicar) on Oct 01, 2009 at 16:33 UTC |