in reply to tagged text parser

It's just plain XML.

I'd recommend you to try XML::Simple. It throws away some data, such as tag order, I think, so try it and see if it works for you. It's easy enough to use so that shouldn't take more than just a few minutes.

There are more elaborate (and less easy to use) XML modules, so if you don't like XML::Simple, come back and we can discuss those that are the best compromise between ease of use, and features.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: tagged text parser
by periapt (Hermit) on Oct 07, 2009 at 16:43 UTC
    Hmmm,

    This has promise. Preliminary tests are positive. Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I wasn't even sure if I was describing the problem correctly Most of he IT types I had discussed this with just sort of looked at me like I was speaking martian.

    This may get me started on some proof of concept. Thanks

    PJ
    use strict; use warnings; use diagnostics;