Re^10: How can I avoid code repetition here

I now see that you meant the case

my $_; # lexical declared in outer scope
sub f {
  # $_ used here....
}
[download]

Sorry for my misunderstanding. But in this case, I don't see why my original code would not work for this case?

--
Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st>

Comment on Re^10: How can I avoid code repetition here Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: How can I avoid code repetition here by JavaFan (Canon) on Oct 12, 2009 at 11:03 UTC
You're missing the case where $_ is defined in an inner scope. Compare: `sub f {say @_ ? $_[0] : $_} sub g (_) {say @_ ? $_[0] : $_} $_ = "outer"; { my $_ = "inner"; f; g; } __END__ outer inner` [download] Lacking the `_` prototype, you original code would not work for the case of lexical `$_` not in the same scope as the function definition.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^12: How can I avoid code repetition here by rovf (Priest) on Oct 12, 2009 at 11:10 UTC
Lacking the _ prototype Again something new I learned about Perl 5.10! Thanks a lot for telling me... -- Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st>	[reply] [d/l]
Re^13: How can I avoid code repetition here by JavaFan (Canon) on Oct 12, 2009 at 11:17 UTC
I did mention the `_` prototype both in text and code in my first reply in this thread.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^14: How can I avoid code repetition here by rovf (Priest) on Oct 12, 2009 at 11:24 UTC