No, I'm interested in the extrema of the short wavelength pulses.
However, I can use your suggestion about long term averages for that, too.
A possible strategy: In the first pass I generate a smoothed dataset from the original using a moving average of about 200 points (or 2-3 periods of the short pulses). This will smoothen out the short wavelength pulses but retain the long term characteristics. Then I compare the original with this smoothed dataset point by point: if it is below the average I need to look for a minimum, if it is above, I look for a maximum.
| [reply] |
With any sort of filter (moving average or low pass) you will induce a delay on the response. That is to say, if you're at a peak in the filtered data and want to match it with the original data, you will need to look back a fixed period of time.
For what it's worth, I think the low pass filter will be much more applicable to your goal since the noise is high frequency periodic. The alpha I provided above does a fine job smoothing out the noise but leaving the pulses of the desired frequency.
| [reply] |