in reply to Re: SHA1 sum archival methods
in thread SHA1 sum archival methods

I completely agree on leaving the design flexible for changes to another capability, later. And, I agree about sharing code. I want to thank fellow monks for the ideas. I was wondering if MLDM compares in speed to these others? Has anyone run a comparison of the speeds from these various modules in the past?

Modules:
DB_File
DBD::SQLite
MLDBM
DBM::Deep

I am interested in speed and ability to house a large number of records. I understand this is probably not possible, and for a large volume of records (>100,000,000) I should probably move to a full DB.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: SHA1 sum archival methods
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 06, 2009 at 01:47 UTC
    MLDB uses DB_File so a benchmark doesn't make any sense.