in reply to Re^11: OO automatic accessor generation
in thread OO automatic accessor generation

we are talking past one another anyway and clearly not speaking about the same things (which seems to be a pattern too, *sigh*)

Shame! I do try very hard to write clearly; and to ask questions and/or paraphrase you, in the hope of getting us on the same page.

ARE YOU PREPARED!!! I know I am, because I have 30 quadrillion type checks

But if half of them are duplicates, is 15 quadrillion enough? And is their overhead totally inconsequential?

one GIANT MONSTER of a stack trace!

Hm. And there was me thinking that $Carp::verbose = 1; would give you that.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
RIP PCW It is as I've been saying!(Audio until 20090817)