Re^2: Net::OpenSSH and Extreme Switch

Salva, thanks for the reply.

When I try your suggestion from the command line, I get no reply (or error) at all.

For the second, I modified the script as you suggested

my $test = $ssh->capture( {stdin_data => "show vlan\n"} );
[download]

and I now get the following:

Keyboard-interactive authentication
Sending a command
Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal.
Operation did not work: child exited with code 255 at ./ssh1.pl line 1
+3.
Output is:
show vlan
[download]

I guess I don't understand why if it works from the command line using OpenSSH, it won't work from the script.

Thanks

Comment on Re^2: Net::OpenSSH and Extreme Switch Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Net::OpenSSH and Extreme Switch by salva (Canon) on Nov 23, 2009 at 22:24 UTC
I guess I don't understand why if it works from the command line using OpenSSH, it won't work from the script. See Re: Unable to run command on Cisco switch.	[reply]
Re^4: Net::OpenSSH and Extreme Switch by rdl (Initiate) on Nov 24, 2009 at 21:18 UTC
According to Extreme, they officially do not support 1 line ssh commands and do not seem interested in changing that. Strike one for Extreme switches thanks again!	[reply]
Re^5: Net::OpenSSH and Extreme Switch by rdl (Initiate) on Dec 02, 2009 at 20:35 UTC
Latest update for anybody that may be interested Exreme TAC finally fessed up and admitted that this was a bug. It has been fixed in 12.3.3.x code. I tested it with 12.3.3.6 code and it seems to work fine.	[reply]
Re^4: Net::OpenSSH and Extreme Switch by rdl (Initiate) on Nov 24, 2009 at 14:13 UTC
Salva, thanks for the clarification. I believe that I am starting to understand now. Not being big on SSH (Ok, I simply don't like it), I did not understand the two modes. I have a script that I have been using for several years using the Net::Telnet module with great success. I am trying to migrate this script to using SSH but not having a lot of luck. Was hoping that this module would be more of a "drop in" replacement (understanding that specifics would have to change). I was hoping to avoid expect, but will look into that option further. Thanks again for the support.	[reply]