in reply to Re^3: better (faster) way of writing regexp
in thread better (faster) way of writing regexp

I don't know what happened with repeat2; the results I posted were cut-n-pasted unchanged. I plan to dig into it tonight to see if I can reproduce and diagnose the glitch.
  • Comment on Re^4: better (faster) way of writing regexp

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: better (faster) way of writing regexp
by diotalevi (Canon) on Dec 03, 2009 at 04:12 UTC

    It's the difference between a duck. You're probably attempting to measure something less expensive than the random noise on your system.

    ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊