in reply to In Defense of Perl

can you please help me come up with some *objective* bullet points in defense of continuing to use Perl?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: In Defense of Perl
by Stegalex (Chaplain) on Jan 12, 2010 at 15:49 UTC
    Don't make me engage in a flame war with you, JavaFan.

    Yes, I come to Perlmonks for objective bullet points because it's worked in the past for me (although you always have to filter out people who insist on monologuing). I *can* come up with points of my own, it's just that I like to cast a wider net and get the opinions of others (probably not a skill you are familiar with). Subjective reasons aren't something I bring to management.

    One of the things I would like to do is to point out large, commercial websites that are still running Perl. I know that Amazon.com used to run Perl, but I doubt that is the case today.

    Which big sites run Perl?

    Thanks.
        Yahoo!'s deployment systems are hugely dependent on Perl.

      Ticketmaster too. Amazon still uses Perl extensively; in the early days it was C and Perl and in house stuff, then a *lot* of Java came and a little Ruby in and some Perl went out, and then Perl staged a bit of a come back.