Re^6: Question about __PACKAGE_

I got your point. I guess I can change class Item to inherit from DBIx::Class::Core instead of DBIx::Class and comment out this line :

__PACKAGE__->load_components( "InflateColumn::DateTime", "Core" );
[download]

Am I right?

Comment on Re^6: Question about __PACKAGE__ Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Question about __PACKAGE__ by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 22, 2010 at 22:33 UTC
I can change class Item to inherit from DBIx::Class::Core instead of DBIx::Class Why would you do that? In your previous post, you showed that you weren't inheriting from DBIx::Class, so why do you say "instead"?	[reply]
Re^8: Question about __PACKAGE__ by sman (Beadle) on Jan 23, 2010 at 02:27 UTC
I have this assertion because seems the following line's function is to add additional base classes to the child class when child class is loaded. So I guess if I declared this inheritance relationship using 'extends' in the beginning, then I do not need to load it using this line. Am I right? `_PACKAGE__->load_components( "InflateColumn::DateTime", "Core" );` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^9: Question about __PACKAGE__ by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 23, 2010 at 03:50 UTC
That sounds like a question. It definitely does not answer the question. You've been expressing so much doubt about doing it, but you can't even give a reason for doing it in the first place, so don't do it.	[reply]