in reply to Re^7: Generating lists of strings
in thread Generating lists of strings

Why the **** are you jumping up and down over my correct solution

I'm "jumping up and down" on the comments you made since I mistakenly thought your solution wasn't correct.

whilst ignoring the incorrect ones?

I don't know them to be incorrect. You're the only one who reimplemented NestedLoops, and my comments don't juast apply to your code and your comments.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: Generating lists of strings
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 25, 2010 at 00:07 UTC
    I don't know them to be incorrect.

    Gah! " but I was looking at a reply that produced incorrect output"

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]
      The author had already corrected himself, so his code was not incorrect.
[reply]

        Not at the point where you chose to post your preferred solution as a critique of mine instead of offering it to the OP.

        BTW:If you check the DB, you'll see that I never actually saw your redacted assertion that my solution was incorrect. Nor commented upon it.

        Run out of steam yet?

        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom