Re: Quick Syntax check

Couldn't he also use a tr/ //d; ?

Update: This was supposed to be a reply to Masem, but ended up being just a comment. Sorry.

Update: Then of course while I was writing it, arturo posted the same suggestion. Blah...

Comment on Re: Quick Syntax check Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Quick Syntax check by japhy (Canon) on May 21, 2001 at 19:30 UTC
Of course, it should be `tr/\n\r\f\t //d` for completeness. `japhy` -- Perl and Regex Hacker	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Quick Syntax check by srawls (Friar) on May 21, 2001 at 22:37 UTC
or just \s Update:Whoops, caught me tye. I guess I was just too quick to post. The 15 year old, freshman programmer, Stephen Rawls	[reply]
(tye)Re: Quick Syntax check by tye (Sage) on May 21, 2001 at 22:38 UTC
No, to tr, \s is the same as s. - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")	[reply]