in reply to A better implementation of LCSS?

I'd upload it under a different namespace. It's a pity that namespaces are "handed" out on a "first asked - first gotten" bases. It means that crappy/unsupported modules can get the "good" names. However, it seems to work ok in practise, and I can only see huge drawbacks against any other system. (Any other system that leads to a "better" (for some values of better) allocation of names (or reallocation of names) requires more people to do work - which includes making decisions that makes some people unhappy).